–From the White House and Presdent Obama following Abdullah’s withdrawal and declaration of Karzai as President of Afghanistan
–From demonstrators in Tehran on November 4, 2009
Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, November 2, 2009
Q Thanks, Robert. A few questions about Afghanistan. Can you tell us, first generally speaking, what’s the President’s reaction to the end of this election? And is he in any way relieved that this sort of messy process is over?
MR. GIBBS: Well, look, I think by all accounts, this has been a difficult process. This is the first election run by the Afghans. But I think the President, the embassy there, and everyone can take heart in the notion that the laws of Afghanistan and the institutions of Afghanistan prevailed in both instances.
Statement by President Barack Obama to reporters, November 2, 2009
In Washington, President Barack Obama told reporters in the White House that he had congratulated Karzai in a telephone conversation. “Although the process was messy, I’m pleased to say that the final outcome was determined in accordance with Afghan law,” Obama said.
— CNN Nov. 2, 2009
Newsweek, on anti-government demonstrators in Iran on Nov. 4:
They chanted, “Death to dictator,” as usual, to protest President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s contested election in June. But, for the first time anyone can remember, they also yelled, “Obama, Obama! Either with them or with us!” The “them” in the chant means Ahmadinejad and the regime writ large.
–Newsweek, November 5, 2009
Throughout the world, many have the highest hopes for the success of President Barack Obama in all areas, and particularly in the area of foreign policy.
However, it should be recalled that in Germany the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, establishing harsh discriminatory policies against German Jews, were adopted in accordance with German national law.
Since that time, standards have changed. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), to which Afghanistan is a Party, provides:
Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 2 and without unreasonable restrictions:
(b) To vote and to be elected at genuine periodic elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot, guaranteeing the free expression of the will of the electors;
What is the standard, Afghan law as interpreted by the Independent Electoral Commission (as preparations proceeded for a corrupt second round election), or the standard established in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights?
As for Iran, can we really assume that the way the U.S., NATO and the U.N. handle matters in Afghanistan has no impact on the Iranian government’s stance in negotiations on nuclear issues?
What will be the response of the U.S. and other countries to the question put by opposition demonstrators in Iran to President Obama: “Are you with them, or with us?”
The Trenchant Observer
Follow at www.twitter.com/trenchobserv
Comments and debate are invited. Please reply below or by private, confidential e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Tags: Abdullah, Abdullah withdrawal, Afghan law, Afghanistan, Afghanistan elections, afghanistan electoral fraud, Afghanistan future, Ahmadinijad, Barack Obama, Germany, institutions of Afghanistan, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Human Rights, International Law, Iran, Iran elections, Karzai, Karzai named President, Karzai second term, law of Aghanistan, Nuremberg Laws, Robert Gibbs, United States Foreign Relations, White House Press