In comments on July 29 following meetings with President Yayi of Benin; President Conde of Guinea; President Issoufou of Niger; and President Ouattara of Ivory Coast, President Barack Obama stated the following:
“Despite the impressive work of all these gentlemen, I’ve said before and I think they all agree, Africa does not need strong men; Africa needs strong institutions. So we are working with them as partners to build effective judiciaries, strong civil societies, legislatures that are effective and inclusive, making sure that human rights are protected.”
–President Barack Obama, West Africa: Remarks By Obama After Meeting With Four African Presidents”, July 29, 2011, reprinted in TheNigerianDaily.com, July 30, 2011.
As we have learned in other contexts, it is important to examine carefully not just what President Obama says but also, and most importantly, what he does. When he speaks of working with these and presumably other African leaders “to build effective judiciaries, strong civil societies, legislatures that are effective and inclusive, making sure that human rights are protected,” one must ask, “What are the specific programs, in which countries, and at what level of funding is he referring to?”
Again, how does this level of funding, per country, compare to the cost of deploying one American soldier to Afghanistan for one year?
Africans struggling to establish or strengthen democracy in their countries need not just words, but deeds. They need specific and meaningful programs that provide financial assistance for the strengthening of civil society organizations, including NGO’s working to ensure observance of fundamental human rights, and judicial reforms that not only improve the functioning of the courts but also expand access to justice among broader sections of the population.
See The Trenchant Observer, “Obama and Democracy in Africa, 2011,” July 16, 2011
Also worth noting in passing is the level of sophistication regarding Africa revealed at the White House, when the President refers to “Cote d’Ivoire” as if no one in the State Department knows the name of the country in English (Ivory Coast). If we are to start using the native languages for the names of different countries, we will have to refer to Egypt as Misr, Algeria as Jaza’ir, and Germany as Deutschland. It’s probably better to stick with English.
Or, to cite another example, when the Deputy National Security Adviser for Africa speaks of the president trying to find ways to speak directly to “the African people,” he is referring to the diverse peoples of the 54 countries of Africa as one people. It as if he were referring to people in Asia as “the Asian people” or the people in Latin America as “the Latin American people”. India, China and Brazil, to cite but a few examples, would not be pleased.
Details count, and are revealing.
The Trenchant Observer
Tags: 2011, administration, Afghanistan, Africa, African democracy, Andrew Malcom, Ben Rhodes, Brookings, Bush, civil societies, civil society, Clinton, commentary, Conde, Cote dÍvoire, defense of democracy, democracy in Africa, democratic force3s, democratic forces, democratic governments, deputy national security adviser, effective judiciaries, elected presidents, elections, four West African presidents, Gabon, Ghandi, Guinea, House of Representatives, human rights, Issoufou, judicial reform, July 29, Krissah Thompson, lame defense, legislatures, Los Angeles Times, magical family tour, Mahatma Ghandi, media celebrities, Michele Obama, Michelle's trip, Mwangi S. Kimenyi, Mwiza Munthali, Nelipher Moyo, Nelson Mandela, Niger, Nigeria, North African countries, Obaba family, Obama's schedule, one U.S. soldier, one year, Ouattara, protectionn of human rights, Republican-controlled House, Sebastian Spio-Garbrah, struggle for democracy, struggle for democracy in Africa, sub-sahaaran Africa, the Arab Spring, The Brookings Institution, The Ticket, TransAfrica Forum, U.S. Africa policy, U.S. support, Washington Post, West Africa, Yayi