Donald Trump, Russian stooge: Putin’s Trojan horse within striking distance of victory over NATO, the EU, and the Atlantic Alliance

Developing

This article has not been indexed by Google. See

“Not indexed by Google: Trenchant Observer article with text of Security Council Resolution 2118; the unregulated power of a totalitarian instrument of thought control,” The Trenchant Observer, September 28, 2013 (updated November 27, 2013).

Curiously, search results of recent articles by The Trenchant Observer have been removed from Startpage.com and even Ixquick.eu.

The article below has been indexed by bing.com, duckduckgo.com, and yahoo.com.

Donald Trump is within striking distance of winning the U.S. presidential election on November 8, 2016.

Polls have tightened.

For recent poll results, see realclearpolitics.com. For the latest results, click here.

FBI Director James B. Comey intervened forcefully in the presidential election process on Friday, October 28, announcing he was reopening the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, casting a dark cloud of suspicion over her candidacy.  The timing was such as to leave her no opportunity to rebut the insinuation that she was guilty of serious misconduct. The effect over the next 8 days of this development is not known, and unknowable.

The polls have varying degres of methodological rigor, and all depend on models of who will vote. The range of results among them is far greater than the respective margins of error involved.

As occurred in the United Kingdom, the actual election results could vary widely from the polls’ predictions. Overconfidence by democrats resulting from the media chorus that Hillary Clinton is far ahead in the polls, and confusion over the meaning of the FBI reopening its investigation of Clinton’s e-mails could lead democratic voters to stay home, while pro-Trump voters could come out of the woodwork in large numbers, to give him a narrow victory.

The momentum of the race may have been changed by FBI Director Comey’s intervention in the race, and the truth is no one really knows what will happen on November 8.

If voters were analytical and rational and held democratic values, it is hard to understand how the race could be as close as it is today.

Meanwhile, there is mounting evidence that, wittingly or unwittingly, Donald Trump is acting as a stooge of the Russians.

See

(1) Anne Applebaum. “Why is Trump suddenly talking about World War III?” Washington Post, October 28, 2016.

(W)e have a Republican presidential nominee who regularly repeats propaganda lines lifted directly from Russian state media. Donald Trump has declared that Hillary Clinton and Obama “founded ISIS,” a statement that comes directly from Russia’s Sputnik news agency. He spouted another debunked conspiracy theory — “the Google search engine is suppressing the bad news about Hillary Clinton” — soon after Sputnik resurrected it.

Now Trump is repeating Kiselyov’s threat, too. “You’re going to end up in World War III over Syria if we listen to Hillary Clinton,” he said this week. Just like Kiselyov, he has also noted that Russia has nukes and — perhaps if Clinton is elected — will use them: “Russia is a nuclear country, but a country where the nukes work as opposed to other countries that talk.”

(2) Matt Payton, “Donald Trump uses ‘Russian propaganda’ to attack Hillary Clinton’s campaign; ‘The Republican nominee for president is standing on a stage reciting the manufactured story as truth,’ says Kurt Eichenwald,” The Independent, October 12, 2016.

A victory on November 8 for Donald Trump would be an immense coup for Vladimir Putin.  It would signify a Russian triumph likely to undermine the solidarity of the European Union and the unity of NATO.

Trump has been friendly to Putin in his public pronouncements.

Until August, one of his principal advisors was Paul Manafort, a former advisor to Viktor Yanukovich, the former president of the Ukraine who fled to Russia when his government collapsed in the face of street protests in February, 2014.

Trump has refused to release his tax returns, which might well reveal his ties to Russian figures and organizations, if they exist.

If Trump is elected, the likely foreign policy consequences vis-a-vis Russia include the following:

1) a collapse of the coordinated EU and US economic sanctions imposed on Russia in response to its invasion and annexation of the Crimea, and its infiltration and invasion of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of the Ukraine.  The latter involved the overt movement of Russian military forces and equipment on an accelerated timetable beginning in August, 2014;

2) an undermining of the stiff resolve and unity of NATO, which has been strengthening its defenses and deployments in countries bordering on Russia;

3) a short-circuiting of the stronger response to Russia Hillary Clinton promises to bring to the foreign policy of the U.S., in Aleppo and Syria and within NATO; and

4)  a decreased likelihood that the U.S. would stand up to nuclear threats from Russia.

Donald Trump has provided no evidence he would be able to take firm action against the Russians in a nuclear show-down. The Russians have increasingly resorted to nuclear threats to achieve their objectives in foreign policy, from the Ukraine to Syria.

In the 1932 elections in Germany, no one really imagined that Adolf Hitler might become Chancellor.

In politics, unexpected things happen.

The Trenchant Observer

About the Author

The Observer
"The Trenchant Observer" is edited and published by The Observer, an international lawyer who has taught International Law, Human Rights, and Comparative Law at major U.S. universities, including Harvard, Brandeis, the University of Pittsburgh, and the University of Kansas. He is a former staff attorney at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States (IACHR), where he was in charge of Brazil, Haiti, Mexico and the United States, and also worked on complaints from and reports on other countries including Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Guatemala. As an international development expert, he has worked on Rule of Law, Human Rights, and Judicial Reform in a number of countries in Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, the Middle East, South Asia, and the Russian Federation. In the private sector, The Observer has worked as an international attorney for a leading national law firm and major global companies, on joint ventures and other matters in a number of countries in Europe (including Russia and the Ukraine), throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, and in Australia, Indonesia, Vietnam, China and Japan. The Trenchant Observer blog provides an unfiltered international perspective for news and opinion on current events, in their historical context, drawing on a daily review of leading German, French, Spanish and English newspapers as well as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and other American newspapers, and on sources in other countries relevant to issues being analyzed. The Observer speaks fluent English, French, German, Portuguese and Spanish, and also knows other languages. He holds an S.J.D. or Doctor of Juridical Science in International Law from Harvard University, and a Doctor of Law (J.D.) and a Master of the Science of Law (J.S.M.), from Stanford University. As an undergraduate, he received a Bachelor of Arts degree, also from Stanford, where he graduated “With Great Distinction” (summa cum laude) and received the James Birdsall Weter Prize for the best Senior Honors Thesis in History. In addition to having taught as a Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School, The Observer has been a Visiting Scholar at Harvard University's Center for International Affairs (CFIA). His fellowships include a Stanford Postdoctoral Fellowship in Law and Development, the Rómulo Gallegos Fellowship in International Human Rights awarded by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and a Harvard MacArthur Fellowship in International Peace and Security. Beyond his articles in The Trenchant Observer, he is the author of two books and numerous scholarly articles on subjects of international and comparative law. Currently he is working on a manuscript drawing on the best articles that have appeared in the blog.

1 Comment on "Donald Trump, Russian stooge: Putin’s Trojan horse within striking distance of victory over NATO, the EU, and the Atlantic Alliance"

  1. Trump is the Russian Trojan Horse. The horse is inside the border now and will open soon. Putin wishes to destabilize North America. See what he did to Ukraine.

Comments are closed.