Developing. We are publishing this article as it is being written. Please check back for updates
To see a list of previous articles, enter “Ukraine” in the Search Box on the upper right, on The Trenchant Observer web site, and you will see a list in chronological order.
Dispatches
1) Fareed Zakaria, “Putin has just made the world a far more dangerous place,” Washington Post, September 22, 2022 (7:02 p.m. EDT).
Analysis
It is perhaps just another case of Children Editors being allowed to select the articles to display in the digital edition of papers like the Washington Post and the New York Times.
Today, the Children Editors have removed Fareed Zacharia’s chilling column anout the risks of nuclear war from the Opinions that display on the digital edition. Zacharia is one of the leading foreign policy commentators in the United States and probably the top opinion writer on foreign affairs at the Washinton Post. His Sunday television program “GPS” is seen by millions of viewers around the world.
See “Update (February 14, 2022): The “Children Editors” at the Washington Post and the New York Times,” The Trenchant Observer, February 14, 2022.
Zacharia warns of the extremely dangerous escalation by Vladimir Putin in the war in Ukraine and the confrontation between the West and Russia.
We are in the first stages of a nuclear showdown between the West and Russia which may turn out to be every bit as grave, and every bit as much of a nail-biter, as the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.
Perhaps the Children Editors don’t display Zacharia’s article prominently because they cannot even imagine the danger we are in and which Zakaria so ably describes.
The nuclear confrontation that has always been implicit in the confrontation between Russia and the West over Ukraine has now become palpable, a reality which it will be increasingly difficult to avoid.
The choice facing the U.S. and the West is, as it has always been, whether to capitulate to Putin’s nuclear threats or to try to manage the confrontation.
A triggering event could be the encirclement of the over 20,000 Russian soldiers on the West side of the Dnipo river in the Kherson region, where they are cur off from supply lines and escape routes.
Another triggering event could be the further collapse of Russian forces in the Dunbas region, or even on the Kherson front.
The United States and NATO need to prepare their response to the potential use of a tactical nuclear weapon by Russia in Ukraine.
In the meantime, they should continue the delivery of arms and training to Ukraine, and active consideration of supplying longer-range HIMARS artillery shells, battle tanks, and fighter aircraft to Kyiv. To shrink back now under Putin’s nuclear threats would probably only encourage him to make further threats.
If he invaded Estonia under the cover of nuclear threats, the situation would be no different.
The suggestions set forth above are made by someone on the outside, based on publicly available information.
Obviously, only U.S. and NATO decision makers with all of the intelligence information at their disposal can make such fateful decisions.
Now would be a good time to bring in a “Nuclear Decisions Advisory Group”, as we have suggested.
The Trenchant Observer
***
A selection of the best articles from The Trenchant Observer is published on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday in the Trenchant Observations newsletter on Substack.
You may subscribe here,