Developing. We are publishing this article as it is being written. Please check back for updates
To see a list of previous articles, enter “Ukraine” in the Search Box on the upper right, on The Trenchant Observer web site, and you will see a list in chronological order.
1) Editorial, “Can Elon Musk’s satellites beat Iranian internet blackouts? It depends,” The Washington Post, October 8, 2022 (7:00 a.m. EDT);
2) “Ukraine War, February 26, 2022: The current fighting; Playing “the China card”–again; Voice of America Russian-language short-wave broadcasts to Russia,” The Trenchant Observer, February 26, 2022.
The Washington Post editorial draws attention to the fact that Iran, Russia and other countries have been developing their capabilities to block news and other internet sites.
For the computer savvy, Virtual Private Networks or VPN’s may provide ways to circumvent the blocking of individual sites, but even VPN’s don’t work when the whole internet is shut down at critical moments (e.g., during demonstrations). Moreover, technology is developing that may permit the blocking of VPN’s or the identification of those who are using them. In police states like Iran and Russia, dire consequences may ensue for users.
In China, the Chinese firewall has effectively blocked Chinese users from accessing Western news and social media sites on the Internet.
Elton Musk’s Starlink system of low-orbiting satellites holds out the promise of anyone accessing the Internet through a satellite connection. This has proven enormously useful in Ukraine, where the government supports the Starlink service.
However, there are two major problems when it comes to countries like Iran, Russia, and China. First, the international telecommunications regulations probably require the authorization by the government of any country using the service. Iran, Russia and China are not likely to grant such authorization.
Second, the equipment required to communicate with the Starlink satellites is not easy to smuggle into a country, and the satellite antenna makes it easy for the government or an informer to identify the location of any user. In police states, the penalties for using an unauthorized internet connection can be severe.
To overcome the problem of electronic curtains, there is an old technology with which younger government decision makers may not be familiar: short-wave radio transmissions.
During the Cold War, broadcasts by the Voice of America and related services such as Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty were successful in penetrating the electronic curtain in Eastern Europe, Russia, China, and other countries.
These transmissions were stopped in 2008 as public diplomacy efforts shifted to the Internet.
Since February, Russia has shut down the websites of independent news sources like the Voice of America and other Western broadcasters such as the BBC and Deutsche Welle (Germany).
There is, however, a cheap and effective way to get independent newscasts into Russia, Iran, China and other countries: Short-wave broadcasts.
The U.S. should immediately resume its short-wave broadcasts to Russia, Iran, China, and other countries.
Pocket-sized short-wave radio receivers can be easily exported or smuggled into Russia, Iran, China, and other countries. They are easy to conceal, and leave no electronic trace of their use.
The U.S. should also urge Western countries to resume their broadcasts to these countries, while the U.S. and others build out and expand their broadcast capabilities (transmitters, antennas, etc.).
One of the reasons this is not being done is bureaucratic inertia. From 1953 to 1999 an independent federal agency, the United States Information Agency (USIA), was in charge of the Voice of America and these short-wave broadcasts, under a charter to provide public broadcasts that were independent and not merely broadcasts of official U.S. government views.
The first head of the USIA was Edward R. Murrow, whose insistence on the independence of the USIA was legendary.
Under President Bill Clinton, the USIA was abolished and its functions assumed by the State Department. When that happened, it lost its independent voice to advocate for the VOA and for a non-political public diplomacy.
We are in a war-like confrontation with Russia which argues for the urgent reintroduction of short-wave broadcasts to Russia, and also Iran.
This should be done at once.
At the same time, the USIA or an independent agency like it should be reestablished or established, to give America a powerful and independent voice that can be heard behind today’s electronic curtains.
The Trenchant Observer
The author is a former summer intern in the Office of the Assistant Director for Europe of the USIA, in Washington.
He was also an avid Short-Wave Listener from age eight, and learned all about radio transmissions as an amateur radio operator or “ham” radio operator from age 11.
A selection of the best articles from The Trenchant Observer is published on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday in the Trenchant Observations newsletter on Substack.
You may subscribe here,
1) “Can Elon Musk’s satellites beat Iranian internet blackouts? It depends,” The Washington Post, October 8, 2022 (7:00 a.m. EDT);