Developing. We are publishing this article as it is being written. Please check back for updates
To see a list of previous articles, enter “Ukraine” in the Search Box on the upper right, on The Trenchant Observer web site, and you will see a list in chronological order.
To understand the broad context within which current developments in Ukraine should be considered,see
“Ukraine War, October 26, 2022: The context for analysis of current developments; The “dirty bomb” as a Russian propaganda distraction from current war crimes,” The Trenchant Observer, October 26, 2022.
1) María R. Sahuquillo, “Jersón o cómo la mayor victoria de Putin va camino de ser su máxima derrota; Rusia disfraza la retirada de la ciudad portuaria bajo la intención de “preservar la vida” de sus tropas, pero esta humillación puede derivar en una oleada de críticas, sobre todo de los ultranacionalistas y de los afectados por la movilización,” El País, el 9 de noviembre 2022 (23:40: actualizado el 10 de
2) Gordon Lubold, Nancy A. Youssef, Laurence Norman,and Drew Hinshaw, “As Ukraine Retakes Kherson, U.S. Looks to Diplomacy Before Winter Slows Momentum; American arms are flowing, but officials in Washington question how much territory either side can win; Ukrainian cities including Kyiv have turned off streetlights to conserve energy after Russian attacks on power plants,” Wall Street Journal, November 13, 2022 (updated at 1:31 p.m. ET);
3) Seth Cropsey, “Mark Milley and the Coming Civil-Military Crisis; His recent comments about the Ukraine war reveal the risks of elevating general officers to positions of political prominence,” Wall Street Journal, November 16, 2022 (7:03 pm ET);
There is something admirable but also something repulsive about U.S. policy toward Ukraine and Russia since the nuclear superpower invaded its much smaller neighbor on February 24, 2022.
What is admirable is the extraordinary amount of military and economic aid the U.S.has given Ukraine.
What is repulsive is the way the U.S. seems willing to fight the war of self-defense against Russia down to the last Ukrainian soldier and the last Ukrainian civilian.
As the article in the Wall Street Journal makes clear, a key goal of the U.S. has been to not get directly involved militarily in the conflict, and ta avoid a nuclear war. An accompanying goal has been to avoid a Ukrainian defeat. The U.S. has never clearly articulated the goal of securing a Ukrainian victory.
European countries and others, including the Observer, view the war differently, as a war to uphold the U.N. Charter and international law, particulaely the principle prohibiting the international use of force and the principle prohibiting the acquision of territory by military conquest. Ukraine has explicitly tied its war aims to these principles.
Now comes the U.S. to pressure Ukraine to enter negotiations with Russia.
Even General Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Sraff, has weighed in favoring negotiations. Secretarty of State Antony Blinken and apparent Ukraine policy czar, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan have pushed Ukraine to show a willingness to enter negotiations with Russia. Sullivan, in a highly unusual move for a National Security Asviser, recently traveled to Kyiv to deliver the message to President Wolodymyr Zelenski in person.
General Milley, for his part, seems to have learned nothing about civil-military relations fprom his walk in full uniform across Lafayette Square with President Donald Trump to make a highly political point, holding a bible upside down.
Either Milley should be replaced for insubordination by making political statements far out of his lane, or he was the conscious tool of a Biden Administration willing to violate bedrock principles of civil-military relations to advance its political objectives.
Both should take a remedial course in civil-military relarions.
The position of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is not a political position. Milley should either shut up or resign.
Milley’s statement that both Russia and Ukraine have suffered about 100,000 casualties each is not consistent with other reporting, and even if true represents the release of highly classified information–which Ukraine clearly doesn’t want released–for highly tendentious political purposes.
The picture that emerges is one of a highly disorganized and undisciplined national security team, which has anomalies such as Jake Sullivan engaging in secret back-channel discussions with Vladimir Putin ‘s aides.
The bad policies and decisions that have emerged from this process have not been inconsequential. They have cost and are costing Ukrainian lives.
The U.S. policy of pressuring Ukraine to enter negotiations with Russia at this point in time reveals either that the U.S. is clueless aboutbthe mandatory principles of international law that preclude the making by ukraine of “territorial concessions”, or that the Biden administration does not view them as neing of overarching importance.
That was the posture of Neville Chamberlain of Britain an ps Ėdouard Daladier of France when they signed the Munich Pact in October, 1938. The “territorial concession” by Czechoslovakia then was the Sudetenland.
Appeasementin 1938 didn’t work out so well.
It’s not going to work out well in 2022 or 2023, or in 2025.
The consequences of the U.S. and allied countries treating the war as Ukraine’s war and not their own war have been fateful.bThey now argue as one reason to seek negotiations between Ukraine and Russia the fact that their stocks of munitions are being depleted.
It is their fault. They had ample warning that if they wanted to uphold the U.N. Charter abd defend interbatibal law, and indeed our entire civilization, they needed to ramp ip war production-in a manner similar to what was donin the U.S. in WW II.
The Trenchant Observer
A selection of the best articles from The Trenchant Observer is published on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday in the Trenchant Observations newsletter on Substack.
You may subscribe here,